Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
STAR Protoc
2020 Dec 18;13:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100177.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
In Vitro Reconstitution and Imaging of Microtubule Dynamics by Fluorescence and Label-free Microscopy.
Hirst WG
,
Kiefer C
,
Abdosamadi MK
,
Schäffer E
,
Reber S
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Dynamic microtubules are essential for many processes in the lives of eukaryotic cells. To study and understand the mechanisms of microtubule dynamics and regulation, in vitro reconstitution with purified components has proven a vital approach. Imaging microtubule dynamics can be instructive for a given species, isoform composition, or biochemical modification. Here, we describe two methods that visualize microtubule dynamics at high speed and high contrast: (1) total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and (2) label-free interference reflection microscopy. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Hirst et al. (2020).
Figure 1. Overall Schematic WorkflowFor each stage (dotted box), steps are annotated.
Figure 2. Schematics and Representative Images of In Vitro Reconstituted Microtubules Imaged by TIRFM and IRM(A) Schematic of a TIRFM microtubule assembly assay using biotinylated GMPCPP-stabilized seeds (red) attached to the coverslip via neutravidin (blue) as nucleation templates for dynamic microtubules (green).(B) Dynamic Cy3-labeled Xenopus microtubules (green) nucleated from GMPCPP-stabilized Cy5-labeled tubulin seeds (red) imaged by TIRFM.(C) Schematic of dynamic microtubules (green) nucleated from rhodamine-labeled GMPCPP-stabilized tubulin seeds (red) immobilized via anti-rhodamine antibodies and imaged by IRM.(D) Xenopus microtubules nucleated from stabilized seeds as in (B) and imaged by IRM. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure 3. Hydrophobicity Test of Cleaned and Silanized Glass SurfacesSchematic showing the behavior of a 10 μL water droplet on a glass surface with increasing hydrophobicity (left to right). The contact angle θ, which increases with hydrophobicity, is the angle between the glass surface and the tangent to the surface of the droplet where it meets the glass.
Figure 4. Schematic of a Flow Chamber
Figure 5. Schematic of the IRM Light PathThe light path and optical components necessary for IRM.
Figure 6. Representative Kymographs of Xenopus Microtubules Imaged by TIRFM and IRM to Analyze Parameters of Dynamic Instability(A and B) Kymograph of a Xenopus microtubule produced from a series of images acquired by (A) TIRFM and (B) IRM.(C) Example of a single microtubule showing growth, shrinkage, catastrophes, and rescues.(D) How to calculate the four dynamics parameters of dynamic instability from kymograph data.
Aitken,
An oxygen scavenging system for improvement of dye stability in single-molecule fluorescence experiments.
2008, Pubmed
Aitken,
An oxygen scavenging system for improvement of dye stability in single-molecule fluorescence experiments.
2008,
Pubmed
Asbury,
Data Analysis for Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy.
2016,
Pubmed
Axelrod,
Total internal reflection fluorescence.
1984,
Pubmed
Bormuth,
LED illumination for video-enhanced DIC imaging of single microtubules.
2007,
Pubmed
Bugiel,
The Kinesin-8 Kip3 Depolymerizes Microtubules with a Collective Force-Dependent Mechanism.
2020,
Pubmed
Caplow,
Evidence that a single monolayer tubulin-GTP cap is both necessary and sufficient to stabilize microtubules.
1996,
Pubmed
Chaaban,
The Structure and Dynamics of C. elegans Tubulin Reveals the Mechanistic Basis of Microtubule Growth.
2018,
Pubmed
CURTIS,
THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS. A STUDY BY INTERFERENCE REFLECTION MICROSCOPY.
1964,
Pubmed
Dixit,
Studying plus-end tracking at single molecule resolution using TIRF microscopy.
2010,
Pubmed
Gardner,
Rapid microtubule self-assembly kinetics.
2011,
Pubmed
Gell,
Purification of tubulin from porcine brain.
2011,
Pubmed
Gell,
Microtubule dynamics reconstituted in vitro and imaged by single-molecule fluorescence microscopy.
2010,
Pubmed
Guo,
Mechanism and dynamics of breakage of fluorescent microtubules.
2006,
Pubmed
Helenius,
The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends.
2006,
Pubmed
Hirst,
Differences in Intrinsic Tubulin Dynamic Properties Contribute to Spindle Length Control in Xenopus Species.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hyman,
Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP.
1992,
Pubmed
Kapoor,
MTrack: Automated Detection, Tracking, and Analysis of Dynamic Microtubules.
2019,
Pubmed
Mahamdeh,
Label-free high-speed wide-field imaging of single microtubules using interference reflection microscopy.
2018,
Pubmed
Mitchison,
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth.
,
Pubmed
Nguyen,
Using supported bilayers to study the spatiotemporal organization of membrane-bound proteins.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ori-McKenney,
Phosphorylation of β-Tubulin by the Down Syndrome Kinase, Minibrain/DYRK1a, Regulates Microtubule Dynamics and Dendrite Morphogenesis.
2016,
Pubmed
Rasnik,
Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging.
2006,
Pubmed
Reusch,
Affinity Purification of Label-free Tubulins from Xenopus Egg Extracts.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schindelin,
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.
2012,
Pubmed
Simmert,
LED-based interference-reflection microscopy combined with optical tweezers for quantitative three-dimensional microtubule imaging.
2018,
Pubmed
Szkop,
A simple and reproducible protocol of glass surface silanization for TIRF microscopy imaging.
2018,
Pubmed
Ti,
Human β-Tubulin Isotypes Can Regulate Microtubule Protofilament Number and Stability.
2018,
Pubmed
Vemu,
Tubulin isoform composition tunes microtubule dynamics.
2017,
Pubmed
Zanic,
Measuring the Effects of Microtubule-Associated Proteins on Microtubule Dynamics In Vitro.
2016,
Pubmed