Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Echinobase
ECB-ART-53430
Development 2024 Dec 04; doi: 10.1242/dev.203152.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Reprogramming of cells during embryonic transfating: overcoming a reprogramming block.

Berrio A , Miranda E , Massri AJ , Afanassiev A , Schiebinger G , Wray GA , McClay DR .


???displayArticle.abstract???
"Regulative development" demonstrated by many animal embryos, is the ability to replace missing cells or parts. The underlying molecular mechanism(s) of that ability is not well understood. If sea urchin micromeres (skeletogenic cell progenitors) are removed at the 16-cell stage, early endoderm initiates a sequential switch in cell fates, called "transfating". Without micromeres, other mesoderm cells are absent as well, because their specification depends on signaling from micromeres. Most mesoderm cells later return by transfating, but pigment cells do not. ScRNA-seq, tracked over time, reveals the reprogramming sequence of those replacements. Beginning with an early endoderm specification state, cells progress through endomesoderm, then mesoderm, and finally distinct skeletogenic and blastocoelar cell specification states emerge, but pigment cells do not. Rescue of pigment cells was found to be a consequence of signal timing: if Delta is expressed prior to Nodal, pigment cells return. Thus, transfating operates through a series of gene regulatory state transitions, and reprogramming fails if endogenous negative signals occur prior to positive signals in the reprogramming sequence.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 39628450
???displayArticle.link??? Development
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

???displayArticle.morpholinos??? wnt8a MO9